![]() |
Victor
|
pages 152-154
No discredit is to be attached to the mine owners for opposing a solid front to the attack of the Western Federation of Miners, nor for straining every nerve to break the strike. To have submitted would have been to admit a condition of subserviency impossible to men of strength and courage. Nor with the police power of the district so thoroughly in the hands of the miners,43 could they be expected not to make every effort to secure the presence of state troops. The position of the Citizens Alliances was also perfectly natural, in opposing a condition that was bringing upon them financial ruin.44
Many of the men employed as guards by the mine owners during the strike were roughs of the worst type, men with criminal records either before or since that time. The following list of mine deputies who committed criminal acts within 12 months after the close of the strike will serve as basis for judging this fact.
MINE DEPUTIES WHO COMMITTED CRIMINAL ACTS WITHIN TWELVE MONTHS AFTER THE CLOSE OF THE STRIKE.
Name. | Crime. | District court trial. | Sentence. |
James Warford | Murder | No. 984 | On second trial, life |
James Warford | Assault | Nos. 909, 923 | 10 to 12 years |
Thomas C. Brown | Murder | No. 923 | Jury disagreed, nolled |
Walter Kenley | Assault, intent to kill | Nos. 909, 912 | 10 to 12 years |
John Police | Fraudulent check | No. 943 | Not tried, Jan. 1906 |
Thomas C. Brown | Theft | No. 939 | Jail sentence |
Charles Fightmaster | Highway robbery | No. 956 | 8 years |
Bert Smith | Highway robbery | No. 956 | 8 years |
Clark Watt | Assault, intent to kill | No. 994 | 10 to 12 years |
John Frame | Assault, intent to kill | No. 994 | 10 to 12 years |
Eugene Scott | Manslaughter | No. 980 | 7 to 8 years |
Thomas Scanlan | Assault | No. 865 | 10 months |
It is not apparent just how much can be adduced from the above statement. The position of deputy at such a time, with its attendant danger, and the certainty of public contempt, will not be accepted by the ordinary citizen. The mine owners had to draw from the only supply available for the purpose, and had to take what they could get. But the fact remains that there were in the employ of the Mine Owners' Association during the strike men capable of almost any crime, and that, as pointed out by the unions, these men might as logically be blamed for the overt acts of the strike as any men who could possibly have belonged to the unions. In the train wrecking case the union attorneys certainly succeeded in throwing a great deal of suspicion upon Detectives Scott and Sterling.45 Charles Beckman, who had joined the Federation as a detective for the mine owners, admitted that he had been urging the commission of various overt acts, but explained that he did so simply that by working into the confidence of the right men he should be in a position to know of such plots.46 In some cases since the strike, officials under the influence of the mine owners have sought in a most disgraceful manner to protect criminal deputies and others from the results of their misdeeds.47
In the lawlessness following the crimes of June 6th the mine owners cannot be separated from the Citizens Alliance. Each had a part but not a separate one. It is the testimony of reliable witnesses that the speech of the secretary of the Mine Owners' Association on the afternoon of the Victor riots was such as any sane man must know would create trouble, and that he was entirely to blame for the starting of the affair.48
The actions of the following days can all be explained as the natural outcome of the conditions. The wave of indignation following the terrible Independence explosion could be expected to carry men off their feet. The great dread that followed the conviction that the Federation was responsible, might be expected to bear some fruit. For men believing as they did there was much excuse for the lawless acts that followed. But to explain lawlessness is not to justify it, to find extenuating circumstances is not to condone it. There are extenuating circumstances for practically all mob violence. There are always extenuating circumstances for the negro lynchings of the South. There were extenuating circumstances for the lynching that occurred near Denver a few years ago, but it roused such a storm as resulted in changing one of the fundamental laws of the State.49 If law is to be observed only when it seems to work no hardship upon those concerned and, when there are no alleviating conditions, it is a poor thing indeed, and useless, for men need no law to follow their own inclinations. One great intent of law is restraint, to compel men to follow one path when there are strong impulses to follow another. The mob outrages in the Cripple Creek District, and the wholesale deportation of men were a disgrace to the commonwealth of Colorado, and will long foster among other peoples a humiliating and unjust judgment of the citizens of that state.